Close X


Fresno Drivers: Is Flashing Headlights to Warn Others Protected Speech?

Posted by Terry A. Wapner | Mar 26, 2014 | 0 Comments

You have most likely seen it happen. Maybe it was you who did it. But, could this act lead to a traffic citation or even worse? I am referring to the act of one Fresno driver flashing his vehicle's headlights in order to alert other drivers that there is a police vehicle up ahead. Recently, a federal judge in Missouri has ruled in favor of drivers.

At the core of the issue is whether flashing headlights is considered to be a form of protected speech, one that is protected by the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) recently sued the town of Ellisville, MO for making it illegal for drivers to “warn” others about an upcoming speed trap or other form of police presence. Since the federal judge's ruling that this law is improper and a violation of the Constitution, ACLU Legal Director Tony Rothert has applauded the judge's finding and hopes that it will “serve as a warning to other cities who try to do the same.”

This is in an important ruling because it was the first federal court to decide this issue anywhere in the country. This means that not only cities in Missouri will think twice about passing a law like this, but others throughout the country will as well. When asked if it would defend others throughout the country who may eventually be cited for a similar offense, the ACLU responded by saying that “if we hear about it happening after today, we will contact them, and ask them to stop.”

It also sends a message in a broader sense. Not only can a state not restrict drivers from flashing headlights, but this means that the concept of protected speech will not be confined to limited situations. Take for instance, a recent Pittsburgh, PA case involving a driver being issued a citation for making an offensive gesture towards an officer. Not only did the ACLU get the citation dismissed because it is considered a form of protected speech, but it cost the city $50,000.

Many times, when cases end this way - officers involved will be required to be retrained in order to prevent similar situations from occurring. However, in the Ellisville case, the city's police chief had immediately begun ordering officers to stop ticketing drivers for flashing their lights right after the suit was originally filed. In addition, the city furthered the prohibition by implementing a ban for any type of detention or arrest of drivers who flash their headlights.

Basically, this means that the judge's ruling will have no real practical effect on police procedure because they had already quit the practice, but it is still considered a win by many in Missouri and countless others throughout the country.

But what about here, in Fresno? Keep in mind that even though the federal judge in Missouri made this ruling, it does not mean that the practice is now illegal everywhere automatically. However, it has set a precedent that other defense attorneys and those who care about the 1st Amendment can refer to when an individual's right to speech has been or is threatened to be restricted.

About the Author

Terry A. Wapner

Terry A. Wapner confines his practice to the defense of persons accused of driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs, and related crimes.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

What Happens Now?

Roadside arrest

It’s a frightening situation. You are arrested for DUI after submitting to a breathalyzer and participating in a couple of field sobriety tests. The officer confiscated your driver’s license and provided you with a temporary license. You were given a notice to appear in court in a few weeks. Now what? Fresno DUI attorney, Terry A. Wapner, can help you make sense of this situation, guide you through the process, and might be able to provide the defense that results in finding you Not Guilty!

Myths & Truths About DUI Charges


Myth: “There is nothing that a Fresno DUI defense lawyer can do.” Truth: Absolutely not true. Over the past 7-10 years, the conviction rate in California for DUI's is only around 70 percent. That means that 30 percent of the charges are being reduced to charges that are less than a DUI charge or not guilty verdicts are being returned. I have the ability and have won Fresno DUI cases. Do not give in to despair and believe that you are destined to lose. Entering a guilty plea to a DUI charge when the evidence against you can be challenged may result in an expensive mistake that could haunt you in the long run.